am I the only one who thinks that analyzing this book as historical evidence for what royalists either believed or wanted others to believe or somesuch c. 1800 about the Revolution and Robespierre might be slightly more useful than uncritically accepting the book's premise
See, but that would require critical thinking and possibly outside investigation. Which is just, like, sooooo boring. And time-consuming. Yawn. I'm in such bright spirits about humanity tonight. -_-
Ahhhh, I my neighbor and I used to eat just straight-up cookie dough all the time. XD
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
regna
(no subject)
Date: Friday, 16 October 2009 01:19 (UTC)am I the only one who thinks that analyzing this book as historical evidence for what royalists either believed or wanted others to believe or somesuch c. 1800 about the Revolution and Robespierre might be slightly more useful than uncritically accepting the book's premise
See, but that would require critical thinking and possibly outside investigation. Which is just, like, sooooo boring. And time-consuming. Yawn.
I'm in such bright spirits about humanity tonight. -_-Ahhhh, I my neighbor and I used to eat just straight-up cookie dough all the time. XD