montagnarde1793: (I did it for the lulz)
montagnarde1793 ([personal profile] montagnarde1793) wrote2010-11-11 10:47 pm

Can anyone verify this for me?

M. Cottret claims (Tuer le tyran ? p. 344) that Robespierre was out sick on the day of Saint-Just's first speech calling for Louis Capet's execution, but she doesn't give a source. (It's possible that it also comes from Vinot, since she cites him a few lines previously, but it's hard to tell.) Does anyone know what the source might be?

Because if it's true - and I doubt M. Cottret would say so if she at least didn't have good reason to believe it - then that rather puts a damper on all those awful, cliché scenes in fiction where Robespierre is either putting him up to it or suddenly inspired to turn into an evil fanatic while hearing the speech. And anything that would prove the logical impossibility of such scenes, would make my evening.


[identity profile] eleonored.livejournal.com 2010-11-12 04:16 am (UTC)(link)
It's well known - Robespierre was absent from the Convention and Jacobins after November 5 and till November 30. Look, for example, Robespierre by Thompson, J.M. (http://library.du.ac.in/xmlui/search?query=robespierre&submit=Go)

[identity profile] maelicia.livejournal.com 2010-11-12 05:09 am (UTC)(link)
I read this elsewhere as well, although I can't quite remember where right now. I could check Vinot once I sobered up. However, it does bring another awful cliché in which Saint-Just's first, amazing, epic speech was in fact... Robespierre sending him to say it. That it was "his" suggestion and that Saint-Just was thus replacing him. :/// Yeah, you get why that upsets me.