montagnarde1793: (colored bust)
[personal profile] montagnarde1793
And what's more, Buffenoir's Les Portraits de Robespierre finally came today. And you know what that means...picspam! 
Not that I think you'll be particularly annoyed, since I'm sure not all of you have seen all of these pictures. (There are seventy-two, and I mean to post them all--except the really well-known ones--eventually, but for tonight twelve will suffice, I think.)













They're not terribly great quality, I know, and I hope you'll forgive me on that point; I don't have particularly sophisticated technology....they looked good in the book!
Also: do tell me which ones you've seen already, and, of course, which ones you like and which ones you don't.

(no subject)

Date: Friday, 9 June 2006 05:05 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] josiana.livejournal.com
Ooooh, pretty. :D Some of those cravats look painful, though.

(no subject)

Date: Friday, 9 June 2006 15:21 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] estellacat.livejournal.com
...Good thing they didn't call people who wore cravats like that "scrofulous" until the Thermidorian reaction.

(no subject)

Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 01:59 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] josiana.livejournal.com
Yes. That would have ended in a horrible disaster of some kind.

It's amusing how different they all look.

(no subject)

Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 03:01 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] estellacat.livejournal.com
Quite possibly.

Indeed it is....I wonder why...

(no subject)

Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 03:05 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] josiana.livejournal.com
XD

...Bored artists?

(no subject)

Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 03:14 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] estellacat.livejournal.com
But just being bored doesn't make artists draw people differently, does it?

(no subject)

Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 03:17 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] josiana.livejournal.com
It might, if they were bored enough to try and emphasize different aspects of his face. Or something.

(no subject)

Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 03:17 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] estellacat.livejournal.com
"Hmm, let's see what happens if I make his nose really big!"

(no subject)

Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 03:20 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] josiana.livejournal.com
Exactly. XD And no one wanted Saint-Just to hunt them down for doing terrible portraits, so no one admitted to doing them.

(no subject)

Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 05:12 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] estellacat.livejournal.com
But what about the non-anonymous bad portraits?

(no subject)

Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 05:16 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] josiana.livejournal.com
They were very very drunk.

(no subject)

Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 05:21 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] estellacat.livejournal.com
*snort* You have to be to mess with Saint-Just.

(no subject)

Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 05:25 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] josiana.livejournal.com
Clearly. He's scary even when he isn't being all ninja-Rose-of-Versailles!Saint-Just and running around in tacky masks.

(no subject)

Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 05:33 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] estellacat.livejournal.com
I believe that was his trademark.

(no subject)

Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 06:04 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] estellacat.livejournal.com
The scariness, mind, not the masks.

(no subject)

Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 17:15 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] josiana.livejournal.com
*giggles* That's probably a good thing. He might have gotten odd tan lines around his eyes if he'd worn a mask all the time.

(no subject)

Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 17:35 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] estellacat.livejournal.com
...Not that we'd know if he had, since portrait-painters don't usually include that sort of thing.

(no subject)

Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 21:35 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] josiana.livejournal.com
...That's true.

(no subject)

Date: Friday, 9 June 2006 08:54 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rainofthenight.livejournal.com
So cool! A man with many faces :D

(no subject)

Date: Friday, 9 June 2006 15:21 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] estellacat.livejournal.com
Or just one that people couldn't figure out how to paint...XD

(no subject)

Date: Friday, 9 June 2006 15:42 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rainofthenight.livejournal.com
Probably depending from how much they liked him :)

(no subject)

Date: Friday, 9 June 2006 22:47 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] estellacat.livejournal.com
That just may have something to do with it.

(no subject)

Date: Friday, 9 June 2006 12:36 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] daughtermestizo.livejournal.com
I like the one fifth from last. He looks so sweet! What a lovely smile! :)

D-M

(no subject)

Date: Friday, 9 June 2006 15:22 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] estellacat.livejournal.com
I rather like that one myself...

(no subject)

Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 00:57 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] daughtermestizo.livejournal.com
*grins* Maxime's such a doll!

(no subject)

Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 01:42 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] estellacat.livejournal.com
He is! ...That one really ought to be made into an icon.

(no subject)

Date: Friday, 9 June 2006 12:53 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maelicia.livejournal.com
Question: why are there so many anonymous portraits?

Possible Answer: because most of them painted badly and feared for their future reputation.

Right, I am slightly too critical and mean, but truly... it seems like Maxime had the ability to morph in front of the painters. Even for Saint-Just, if the portraits are annoyingly different, there are a few common traits, such as the nose, the visage, etc.

Anyway, answering your required comments now:

I had seen the 3rd, with the awfully tight breeches *snorts*

I must admit I absolutely dislike Greuze's. I do like the 7th one though. It seems nice. And the last, too, for the leg *snickers* but also because it's supposed to be at the Duplay home.

(no subject)

Date: Friday, 9 June 2006 15:26 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] estellacat.livejournal.com
I think the reason the anonymous portraits are so bad is often because they're anonymous, not vice-versa; he probably didn't sit down and pose for those and the artists were probably painting/sketching from memory.

There are still a few common traits with Maxime if you look carefully enough; it's the way they're emphasized that makes a huge difference.

...Especially since that one is supposedly after David.

I don't like Greuze's much either, although it doesn't look quite as bad in the book. The seventh, I agree on: it's quite nice. As to the last, there's a better one of him at the Duplays later in the book...

(no subject)

Date: Friday, 9 June 2006 15:32 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maelicia.livejournal.com
Hmph, drama queenish amateur artists, obviously. Frustrated because they couldn't get a pose.

Wait, what did David the Perv sketched again???

(no subject)

Date: Friday, 9 June 2006 15:39 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maelicia.livejournal.com
...oh, THAT ONE is by David.

*wails*

I knew there was something about it...

I have a part of it in colour, too.



This is SO being turned into an icon.

(no subject)

Date: Friday, 9 June 2006 22:46 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] estellacat.livejournal.com
It makes sense...

I've seen the colored one, but I had never seen it in full...

I can't wait to see the icon of that;)

(no subject)

Date: Friday, 9 June 2006 23:16 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maelicia.livejournal.com
*winks*

I believe I know why we can't get a high-resolution version of that portrait. The tightness can kill.

(no subject)

Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 00:09 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] estellacat.livejournal.com
That icon is awesome!

I don't doubt it!

(no subject)

Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 00:33 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maelicia.livejournal.com
*entranced* It's so incredibly tight...

Ahem. *coughs*

I also made a special Camillish icon. Sort of.

Will MSN be worthy of your presence tonight, or there are still ebil books to be read?

(no subject)

Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 01:02 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] estellacat.livejournal.com
...You wouldn't think he would have worn culottes like that...especially not with Saint-Just around.

Awwww...it's so cute! Curse you and your icon making ability!

No books, but I have a chemistry final and an English project.
....neither of which I'm working on tonight ;)

(no subject)

Date: Friday, 9 June 2006 19:28 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zigsternenstaub.livejournal.com
I'm so reassured by the fact that almost none of these portraits resemble each other. Wonderful. One of the beautiful drawbacks of the pre-photographic era. We can never be truly sure what people really looked like.

(no subject)

Date: Friday, 9 June 2006 22:48 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] estellacat.livejournal.com
It is indeed quite annoying. But at least they seem to have similar features; it's just that, if they're manipulated even slightly, it completely changes the whole appearance.

Profile

montagnarde1793: (Default)
montagnarde1793

October 2014

S M T W T F S
   1234
5678 91011
12131415161718
19202122 232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios