Joyeuse Fête de l'Etre Suprême!
Thursday, 8 June 2006 20:58![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
And what's more, Buffenoir's Les Portraits de Robespierre finally came today. And you know what that means...picspam!
Not that I think you'll be particularly annoyed, since I'm sure not all of you have seen all of these pictures. (There are seventy-two, and I mean to post them all--except the really well-known ones--eventually, but for tonight twelve will suffice, I think.)












They're not terribly great quality, I know, and I hope you'll forgive me on that point; I don't have particularly sophisticated technology....they looked good in the book!
Also: do tell me which ones you've seen already, and, of course, which ones you like and which ones you don't.
Not that I think you'll be particularly annoyed, since I'm sure not all of you have seen all of these pictures. (There are seventy-two, and I mean to post them all--except the really well-known ones--eventually, but for tonight twelve will suffice, I think.)












They're not terribly great quality, I know, and I hope you'll forgive me on that point; I don't have particularly sophisticated technology....they looked good in the book!
Also: do tell me which ones you've seen already, and, of course, which ones you like and which ones you don't.
(no subject)
Date: Friday, 9 June 2006 05:05 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Friday, 9 June 2006 15:21 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 01:59 (UTC)It's amusing how different they all look.
(no subject)
Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 03:01 (UTC)Indeed it is....I wonder why...
(no subject)
Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 03:05 (UTC)...Bored artists?
(no subject)
Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 03:14 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 03:17 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 03:17 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 03:20 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 05:12 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 05:16 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 05:21 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 05:25 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 05:33 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 05:35 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 06:04 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 17:15 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 17:35 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 21:35 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Friday, 9 June 2006 08:54 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Friday, 9 June 2006 15:21 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Friday, 9 June 2006 15:42 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Friday, 9 June 2006 22:47 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Friday, 9 June 2006 12:36 (UTC)D-M
(no subject)
Date: Friday, 9 June 2006 15:22 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 00:57 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 01:42 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Friday, 9 June 2006 12:53 (UTC)Possible Answer: because most of them painted badly and feared for their future reputation.
Right, I am slightly too critical and mean, but truly... it seems like Maxime had the ability to morph in front of the painters. Even for Saint-Just, if the portraits are annoyingly different, there are a few common traits, such as the nose, the visage, etc.
Anyway, answering your required comments now:
I had seen the 3rd, with the awfully tight breeches *snorts*
I must admit I absolutely dislike Greuze's. I do like the 7th one though. It seems nice. And the last, too, for the leg *snickers* but also because it's supposed to be at the Duplay home.
(no subject)
Date: Friday, 9 June 2006 15:26 (UTC)There are still a few common traits with Maxime if you look carefully enough; it's the way they're emphasized that makes a huge difference.
...Especially since that one is supposedly after David.
I don't like Greuze's much either, although it doesn't look quite as bad in the book. The seventh, I agree on: it's quite nice. As to the last, there's a better one of him at the Duplays later in the book...
(no subject)
Date: Friday, 9 June 2006 15:32 (UTC)Wait, what did David the Perv sketched again???
(no subject)
Date: Friday, 9 June 2006 15:39 (UTC)*wails*
I knew there was something about it...
I have a part of it in colour, too.
This is SO being turned into an icon.
(no subject)
Date: Friday, 9 June 2006 22:46 (UTC)I've seen the colored one, but I had never seen it in full...
I can't wait to see the icon of that;)
(no subject)
Date: Friday, 9 June 2006 23:16 (UTC)I believe I know why we can't get a high-resolution version of that portrait. The tightness can kill.
(no subject)
Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 00:09 (UTC)I don't doubt it!
(no subject)
Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 00:33 (UTC)Ahem. *coughs*
I also made a special Camillish icon. Sort of.
Will MSN be worthy of your presence tonight, or there are still ebil books to be read?
(no subject)
Date: Saturday, 10 June 2006 01:02 (UTC)Awwww...it's so cute!
Curse you and your icon making ability!No books, but I have a chemistry final and an English project.
....neither of which I'm working on tonight ;)
(no subject)
Date: Friday, 9 June 2006 19:28 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Friday, 9 June 2006 22:48 (UTC)