Antoinette movie
Monday, 29 May 2006 10:25![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
This movie is really going to suck. Muchly.
http://www.liberation.fr/page.php?Article=384772
Apparently the People are reduced to the stereotypical "angry mob" so if the average viewer does not like barbie-pink!Antoinette, they'll have little choice in sympathies, because she and the rest of the Court will be the only human characters.
It's a lot easier for most people to sympathize with one person, even if she is the most annoying bimbo they have ever seen, than a "mob" with a good reason to be angry!
That said, from what I can tell, Liberation is treating this with irony, and seems to be pointing out that the subject matter is somewhat....irrelevant: big surprise there!
...at any rate, it's not a positive review, and I like the publication overall, so...
http://www.liberation.fr/page.php?Article=384772
Apparently the People are reduced to the stereotypical "angry mob" so if the average viewer does not like barbie-pink!Antoinette, they'll have little choice in sympathies, because she and the rest of the Court will be the only human characters.
It's a lot easier for most people to sympathize with one person, even if she is the most annoying bimbo they have ever seen, than a "mob" with a good reason to be angry!
That said, from what I can tell, Liberation is treating this with irony, and seems to be pointing out that the subject matter is somewhat....irrelevant: big surprise there!
...at any rate, it's not a positive review, and I like the publication overall, so...
(no subject)
Date: Monday, 29 May 2006 23:59 (UTC)Correction. YOU will think of something. I'll try to counter it and be outvoted.
I knew it! *squees* Now I really want to watch! They're so cute!!
(no subject)
Date: Tuesday, 30 May 2006 00:05 (UTC)Oh, come on; we have to do something!
They are. So very much. This movie has a very nice amount of cuteness. Unfortunately, it's a bit heavy on the sadness....oh well, I suppose it's the subject matter; it can't be helped.
(no subject)
Date: Tuesday, 30 May 2006 00:08 (UTC)Yes, but MUST it be a frontal assault?
Awwwwwwwww. I love cuteness. But yeah, I suppose the sadness can't be helped. Poo.
(no subject)
Date: Tuesday, 30 May 2006 00:22 (UTC)I suppose it doesn't have to be....Do you have any suggestions?
It's got very few un-upsetting parts, actually (part II, that is). Part I is less upsetting, but still...
(no subject)
Date: Tuesday, 30 May 2006 00:32 (UTC)I imagine it would. Poor, tragic Maxime.
(no subject)
Date: Tuesday, 30 May 2006 00:33 (UTC)*sniffs* He is rather tragic.
(no subject)
Date: Tuesday, 30 May 2006 00:36 (UTC)Is Hérault in Part I, by any chance?
(no subject)
Date: Tuesday, 30 May 2006 00:43 (UTC)I don't remember, but he ought to be...
(no subject)
Date: Tuesday, 30 May 2006 00:44 (UTC)I have yet to see a good Hérault-Séchelles in a movie. I couldn't find him in "Danton" and LRF's version was embarassing. He looked more like Brissot. And Brissot looked like a cross between Collot d'Herbois and someone else. Who wasn't Brissot.
(no subject)
Date: Tuesday, 30 May 2006 00:48 (UTC)...I'll look for him.
*cracks up at descriptions*
(no subject)
Date: Tuesday, 30 May 2006 00:50 (UTC)*snickers* LRF!Brissot = Collot d'Herbois hybrid
(no subject)
Date: Tuesday, 30 May 2006 00:53 (UTC)...He does look it.
(no subject)
Date: Tuesday, 30 May 2006 00:56 (UTC)Poor Brissot. He suffered enough without having to look like a Collot hybrid.
(no subject)
Date: Tuesday, 30 May 2006 01:01 (UTC)Brissot had some....issues, though.
(no subject)
Date: Tuesday, 30 May 2006 01:03 (UTC)You mean being a Girondin, for example?
(no subject)
Date: Tuesday, 30 May 2006 01:04 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Tuesday, 30 May 2006 01:05 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Tuesday, 30 May 2006 02:16 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: Tuesday, 30 May 2006 00:50 (UTC)And, hmm, boycott? Vandalize? Wtf. Really. ;P
(no subject)
Date: Tuesday, 30 May 2006 00:55 (UTC)I know! We must try to get DM to stop being so....moderate.
(no subject)
Date: Tuesday, 30 May 2006 02:33 (UTC)*glares*
(no subject)
Date: Tuesday, 30 May 2006 02:38 (UTC)...you know you want to be.
(no subject)
Date: Tuesday, 30 May 2006 02:40 (UTC)Besides, I'm perfectly happy back here with Maxime.
(no subject)
Date: Tuesday, 30 May 2006 02:43 (UTC)Who says Maxime is as moderate as you are?
(no subject)
Date: Tuesday, 30 May 2006 13:36 (UTC)No one. But I doubt he'd go for a frontal assault.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: